I've read that some people when they get enlightened they no longer see the value in physical survival, because they kind of reached the end goal I suppose.
So I wonder, do the Sedona Method (organisation) value physical survival?
In the world today we use money as a medium of exchange, and to make any kind of money you have to provide some kind of value to other people.
Some people, because of abuse, trauma or illness or some other reason, are unable to contribute value to other people, so they also don't make money. I would imagine most homeless people are in this category.
I live in Norway where we have cold winters, and I read about a homeless person who froze to death. I don't know if he had goals about a better life, but if he had he didn't reach his goals in time and that cost him his life. And probably a lot of strife for some time before that too.
I get that, for most goals in life, being hootless is a good strategy. If you get the goal it's ok, and if you don't get it it's also ok.
But what if your life depends on reaching your goal? Should you still be hootless about that goal?
Are there times where letting go is not the appropriate way to deal with a goal?
Are there times where you should actually hold on for dear life, put in a ton of effort and be as emotionally attatched to reaching the goal as possible? I mean, if your life depends on it?
And if so, can we say that, letting go and being hootless about goals is great, but only provided that you are already able to get basic things done?
I've never seen this discussed or mentioned, is it just taken for granted because most people that find this method and get involved with it are already able to survive, so no one really thinks about it?
Is it the unspoken foundation of all this work and the method itself, that first and foremost you have to be able to get things done, take care of yourself and survive. And only when that criteria is met are you free to have fun with this method, and the luxury of being hootless about your goals?
So I wonder, do the Sedona Method (organisation) value physical survival?
In the world today we use money as a medium of exchange, and to make any kind of money you have to provide some kind of value to other people.
Some people, because of abuse, trauma or illness or some other reason, are unable to contribute value to other people, so they also don't make money. I would imagine most homeless people are in this category.
I live in Norway where we have cold winters, and I read about a homeless person who froze to death. I don't know if he had goals about a better life, but if he had he didn't reach his goals in time and that cost him his life. And probably a lot of strife for some time before that too.
I get that, for most goals in life, being hootless is a good strategy. If you get the goal it's ok, and if you don't get it it's also ok.
But what if your life depends on reaching your goal? Should you still be hootless about that goal?
Are there times where letting go is not the appropriate way to deal with a goal?
Are there times where you should actually hold on for dear life, put in a ton of effort and be as emotionally attatched to reaching the goal as possible? I mean, if your life depends on it?
And if so, can we say that, letting go and being hootless about goals is great, but only provided that you are already able to get basic things done?
I've never seen this discussed or mentioned, is it just taken for granted because most people that find this method and get involved with it are already able to survive, so no one really thinks about it?
Is it the unspoken foundation of all this work and the method itself, that first and foremost you have to be able to get things done, take care of yourself and survive. And only when that criteria is met are you free to have fun with this method, and the luxury of being hootless about your goals?
Comment